|
As You
Sleep
It is said
that we learn from history, Do We??
You're
sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half awake,
and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least
two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your
heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun.
You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it.
In the darkness, you make out two shadows. One holds something that looks
like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise
the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes
and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.
As
you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble. In
your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are
privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours
was never registered.
Police
arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you
for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When
you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will
probably plea the case down to manslaughter. "What kind of sentence will
I get?" you ask. "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing.
"Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven.
"The
next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper. Somehow,
you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are
represented as choir boys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind
word to say about them. Buried deep down in the article, authorities
acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times. But
the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve
to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin
Hood-type pranksters.
As
the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up,
then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.
Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably
win. The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several
times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their
lack of effort in apprehending the suspects.
After
the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next
time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in
wait for the burglars.
A few
months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as your
lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your
anger at the injustice of it all works against you. Prosecutors paint a
picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury
to convict you of all charges. The judge sentences you to life in prison.
This
case really happened. On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth,
Norfolk, England, killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000,
he was convicted and is now serving a life term.
How
did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British
Empire? It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly
reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established
that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The
Firearms
Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but
all firearms except shotguns. Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967
outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the
registration
of all shotguns.
Momentum
for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass
shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov
rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke
cleared, 17 people were dead.
The
British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control",
demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned
handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)
Nine
years later, at Dunblane, Scotland, Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic
weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.
For
many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable,
or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up
law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave
up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns.
The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearm
still owned by private citizens. During the years in which the British
government mentally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen
had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism.
Authorities
refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that
self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who
shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals
were released. Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was
quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands.
"All
of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly
people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear
of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen
most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars. When the Dunblane
Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn
them over to local authorities. Being good British subjects, most people
obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by police
and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply.
Police
later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.
How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered
and licensed. Kinda like cars.
Sound
familiar? WAKE UP AMERICA, THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS
PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.
"..it
does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority
keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." --Samuel Adams
Robert
A. Waters
|
|
Submission
By Glen Schmidt
Thank
you Glen |
"In Germany
they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't
a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because
I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak
up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for Catholics, and
I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and
by that time no one was left to speak up.
Martin
Neimoller |